Raw Food Diets: The Raw-Hard Facts
The debate surrounding raw food diets has sparked considerable discussion among pet owners and veterinary professionals alike. At the heart of this debate lies the quest for providing optimal nutrition for our furry companions while navigating through a sea of misinformation and anecdotal claims.
In this article, we take a look at the raw-hard facts behind raw food diets, shedding light on the most recent scientific findings and dispelling common misconceptions.
The Pros of Raw Food Diets
Proponents of raw diets often cite various perceived benefits, including smaller, more formed faeces, a shiny coat, healthier teeth and oral cavity, and a diet that aligns more closely with what a dog would consume in the wild. However, it's essential to examine these claims through a scientific lens rather than relying solely on anecdotal evidence, bearing in mind also that research in raw food diets have not been extensivly researched and there is still a lot for us to learn.
Understanding Canine Evolution
Recent research into the canine genome has revealed fascinating insights into the domestication of dogs. The transition from wild wolves to domesticated dogs involved significant genetic changes, particularly in genes related to starch digestion, suggesting an evolutionary adaptation to a diet that includes carbohydrates. This raises questions about the suitability of raw diets in modern pet nutrition, as our pomeranian’s and huskies have a very different digestive system to their Canis lupis ancestors.
The Scientific Perspective
Despite the perceived benefits touted by raw diet advocates, scientific studies often paint a different picture. Research has shown that raw food diets can lead to increased dysbiosis in the gut microbiome of dogs, potentially compromising digestive health. Moreover, there is limited evidence to support claims of improved oral health, skin condition, or overall well-being in pets fed raw diets.
Risks Associated with Raw Diets
Zoonotic potential is a significant concern associated with raw diets, as evidenced by a study involving pet therapy dogs, which revealed nearly eight times higher shedding of Salmonella bacteria in the faeces of dogs fed raw diets compared to those on commercial diets. Shockingly, the majority of raw-fed dogs would test positive for Salmonella at least once per year, highlighting the elevated risk posed by raw feeding practices. In contrast, dogs on commercial diets showed zero feral shedding of Salmonella, emphasizing the stark disparity in zoonotic potential between raw and commercial feeding regimes.
Additionally, concerning instances have arisen, such as cats in the UK testing positive for tuberculosis after being fed a raw food commercial diet centered around venison. This strain of tuberculosis is not only transferable to humans but has also resulted in two confirmed cases where both a veterinarian and pet owner tested positive for the disease, underscoring the potential health risks associated with raw diets for both pets and their human companions.
Challenging the Narrative
Amidst the fervor surrounding raw diets, it's crucial to distinguish between fact and fiction. Claims of nutritional superiority and improved palatability must be scrutinized against scientific evidence. Moreover, the potential health risks associated with raw diets, including hyperthyroidism and exposure to dangerous pathogens, cannot be overlooked.
Moving Forward
As the debate over raw diets continues, it is imperative to approach the topic with a balanced perspective. While acknowledging the instinctual appeal of raw diets for pet owners, we must prioritize evidence-based nutrition to safeguard the health and well-being of our beloved pets. Further research is needed to address lingering questions and explore alternative dietary options that prioritize both nutrition and safety.
In the ever-evolving landscape of pet nutrition, separating fact from bias is paramount. While raw diets may hold allure for some pet owners, it is essential to weigh the potential benefits against the substantial risks they pose. By embracing a scientific approach and remaining open to new discoveries, we can navigate the complexities of pet nutrition with confidence and clarity.
Medically reviewed by Dr. Kirra Balmanno
If you would like to discuss your pet’s nutrition with one of Vetli’s Board-Certified veterinarians, book an appointment here.
References:
Schmidt, M., Unterer, S., Suchodolski, J. S., Honneffer, J. B., Guard, B. C., Lidbury, J. A., ... & Kölle, P. (2018). The fecal microbiome and metabolome differ between dogs fed Bones and Raw Food (BARF) diets and dogs fed commercial diets. PloS one, 13(8), e0201279.
Joffe, D. J., & Schlesinger, D. P. (2002). Preliminary assessment of the risk of Salmonella infection in dogs fed raw chicken diets. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 43(6), 441–442.
O’Halloran, C., Tørnqvist-Johnsen, C., Woods, G., Mitchell, J., Reed, N., Burr, P., ... Gunn-Moore, D. (2020). Feline tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium bovis infection of domestic UK cats associated with feeding a commercial raw food diet. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 1–9. Advance online publication.